isnt “objectively” “good” art, commercial art?
when does art stop being art in the commercial sense. is it when other artists have digested it enough that a more general sense can be attained for the crowds.
nietszche (an outsider to me yes) explained that theres art, something akin to being stood precariously on the edge too close to that amazing waterfall, the existential threat tied into to the beautfil majesty creates the whole experience, like pure art. something that defies explination initially due to the jarring impact on the purveyors first time meeting with this slice of reality. so theres pure art. imitation art which is the digested art from other artists and last but not least, stripped of all its metaphysical meat is commercial art, the big time bois! the we made it! ick af ye!
thats why this sites important. we’re artists. this discussion itself is the art. a conveyance beyond what the tools we’ve seen out there that exist struggle to convey.
so to me, its not about ‘likes’ or wether you agree with it or think it has merit. more so that we recognise each other as artists. so making its a moot point. especially cosnider how we are ‘the outsiders’ and a success for us would probabky be the perverting the course of mankind with the best intentions.
also… anyone notice that netflix thing about hybrid humans animals is basically hubb hahahaha. tal,king about perverting the bigger picture haha.