Dubstep was once a genre which had no rules or limitations with the exception of having low-end frequency, just for the listener to fall into a type of trance, hence the term “Meditate on Bassweight.”
I probably just wouldn’t. Dubstep is something I try pretty hard to avoid talking to people about IRL, and even most parts of the internet, unless I know they’re relatively clued in. Otherwise it just descends into a shit chucking contest for me.
Otherwise any dubstep track could be turned into dnb/breakbeat/house etc. just by changing the tempo a little bit. Other stuff like sub bass could be just as well used when trying to define some other genres.
halftime isnt really necessary though, it’s common but not a requirement.
“Bass driven music at around 140 bpm” is probably the best definition I’ve seen used because it’s quite broad. No point trying to define dubstep (or any genre for that matter), if you really wanted to “explain” dubstep to someone it would be better to play them a few tracks to let them get a feel for it.
Probably yeah. I like both deep stuff and midrange tearout, but it still went out of hand. So little amount of people who make brostep have any originality that makes them stick from the mass. Song structures and melodies are getting cheaper every (unless they already hit the bottom, I haven’t been following the scene really that much recently).